In the National System

This section of the web site will contain information about federal court cases and federal laws and policies that influence pregnant and parenting women, their families, and their communities.

Open Letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee

June 19, 2009


[Download a PDF of the letter here.]


Nominee: Is there a point in pregnancy when you believe women lose their civil rights?


June 19, 2009



Dear Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee:



Long before President Obama selected Judge Sotomayor as his nominee to the Supreme Court, advocacy groups and media outlets identified the issue of “abortion rights” as a key issue for determining the nominee’s qualifications.1 Focusing on abortion, however, makes it possible to ignore critical issues for women that might not be readily apparent. Nearly a million women each year terminate their pregnancies, close to another million suffer miscarriages and stillbirths, and more than four million women continue their pregnancies to term: Each and every one of these women benefits from the Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade.2


Roe stands for much more than the right to terminate a pregnancy. As the Supreme Court explained in later cases, Roe has been “sensibly relied upon to counter” attempts to interfere with a woman's decision to become pregnant or to carry her pregnancy to term.3 In Roe, the Court rejected the argument that fetuses are persons and that states may treat them as such. In so doing the Court protected the Constitutional personhood of women. Thus, while the court in Roe recognized a limited state interest in potential life that permits states to prohibit access to abortion under some circumstances, the decision established that there is no point in pregnancy when women lose their fundamental civil rights – to bodily integrity, informed medical decision-making, due process, liberty, and life itself.


Roe and subsequent decisions recognized that according legal rights to fetuses separate from those of the pregnant women would not only jeopardize women’s lives and health by denying them access to legal abortion, but would also undermine substantially their dignity, their ability to participate as full and equal citizens in our society, in short their status as full Constitutional persons.4


Experience before Roe makes clear that if it were overturned hundreds of women would die each year from illegal abortions and thousand would have to risk their lives and liberty or be forced to endure unwanted pregnancies.5 While few women were arrested pre-Roe,6 legal action since then, including the arrests discussed below, suggests that it is far more likely that if abortion becomes illegal again, women themselves will be arrested.7 Experience from other countries that still have restrictive abortion laws, establishes that criminalizing abortion does little to reduce the rate at which women seek to terminate their pregnancies.8 Instead, it determines the conditions, often dangerous and demeaning, under which women do so.9


When laws criminalizing abortion were originally passed in the United States, one justification was to protect pregnant women from what had been, but is no longer, a dangerous procedure. Today the primary argument for outlawing abortion is that the “unborn” have separate legal rights. As Ramesh Ponnuru, a conservative writer, explained in a piece imagining life after Roe: “The crucial legal goal of the pro-life movement is . . . that unborn children be protected in law.”10 This is one reason why the harm of overturning Roe extends beyond the issue of abortion.


For example, the claim that fetuses have legal rights independent of pregnant women, or that the state may assert such rights on behalf of fetuses, has been invoked to justify court orders taking custody of pregnant women and forcing them to undergo major surgery for the alleged benefit of the fetus.11 In one case, later overturned on appeal, the surgery resulted in the death of the pregnant woman and her baby.12 Claims of fetal rights were used to justify extraordinary state action against a Florida woman who wanted to have a vaginal birth after a previous delivery by Cesarean surgery. When she was near delivery, an armed Sheriff came to her home, took her into custody, strapped her legs together and transported her to a hospital, where, without any opportunity to challenge the state’s actions, she was forced to undergo major surgery that she believed was unnecessary and dangerous to her and her baby. When she sued for violations of her civil rights, including deprivation of physical liberty and forced surgery without any semblance of due process, a federal district court said that "[w]hatever the scope of Ms. Pemberton's personal constitutional rights in this situation, they clearly did not outweigh the interests of the State of Florida in preserving the life of the unborn child."13


The argument that fetuses have separate legal rights (as opposed to moral value) has been used to justify the arrest of hundreds of pregnant women who love their children but who have not been able to overcome an addiction in the short duration of a pregnancy.14 This claim has been used to justify policies targeting low-income women of color for illegal searches and seizures.15 It has been used to justify the arrest and detention of pregnant women who drank alcohol,16 who exercised their right to informed consent by refusing cesarean surgery,17 who didn’t get to the hospital quickly enough on the day of delivery,18 who were in a “dangerous” location while pregnant,19 who refused to submit to state ordered prenatal exams,20 who are HIV-positive,21 and who have experienced miscarriages and stillbirths.22 This argument has been used to justify discrimination against women in the workplace.23 It has been used as the basis for civil suits on behalf of children against their mothers for alleged acts of negligence during pregnancy.24 It has been used to appoint or consider appointing guardians ad litem for fetuses not only to prevent abortions but also to determine what medications the pregnant woman would be allowed to take and how she might be required to deliver.25


Fortunately, these horrific cases do not represent controlling legal precedent. Many of the cases were dismissed when challenged and most of the lower court decisions upholding these state actions were overturned on appeal. Those cases that survived do so only as exceptional outliers, in part, because Roe stands as the law of the land.


Abortion is undeniably a key and contentious issue in the confirmation process, but it is important to remember that 60% of women having abortions are already mothers26 and that by age 44, approximately 84% of all women in the United States have been pregnant and given birth.27


Because decisions regarding Roe v. Wade will inevitably affect all pregnant women, we the undersigned request that the Judiciary Committee ask Judge Sotomayor (and every future Supreme Court nominee): Is there a point in pregnancy when you believe women lose their civil rights? If so, what is that point; and on what do you base your conclusion?


Respectfully submitted,




Lynn Paltrow, JD, Executive Director, National Advocates for Pregnant Women


Kim Abbott, Organizer, Montana Human Rights Network


Jill E. Adams, JD, Executive Director, Law Students for Reproductive Justice


Jane Aiken, JD, Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law*


Sara Ainsworth, JD, Senior Legal & Legislative Counsel, Legal Voice (formerly Northwest Women's Law Center)


Anita L. Allen, JD, PhD, Henry R. Silverman Professor of Law and Professor of Philosophy, University of Pennsylvania Law School


Elise Andaya, PhD, Assistant Professor of Anthropology, University at Albany


Annette R. Appell, JD, Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Washington University School of Law


Nancy Aries, PhD, Professor, Baruch College*


Charon Asetoyer, Executive Director, Native American Community Board


Byllye Avery, Founder, Avery Institute for Social Change*


Fran Blumberg, PhD, Associate Professor, Fordham University*


Sheila Blume, MD


Nancy D. Campbell, PhD, Associate Professor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute*


Monica J. Casper, PhD, Professor of Social & Behavioral Sciences and Women's Studies, Arizona State University*


Margaret Chapman, Executive Director, WV FREE


April L. Cherry, JD, Associate Professor of Law, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, Cleveland State University


Ellen Wright Clayton, MD, JD, Director, Center for Biomedical Ethics and Study, Vanderbilt University*


Rhonda Copelon, Professor, City University of New York School of Law*


Carol C. Coulson, MD, Clinical Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Mountain Area Health Education Center*


Kim J. Cox, PhD, CNM, ARNP, Women's Health Nurse Practitioner, Duval County Health Department*


Crystal D. Crawford, JD, CEO, California Black Women's Health Project


Cynthia R. Daniels, PhD, Chair, Political Science Department, Rutgers University


Natalia Deeb-Sossa, PhD, Assistant Professor of Sociology, University of California Davis


Patricia Dempsey, DSW, Associate Professor, Hunter College School of Social Work*


Dázon Dixon Diallo, MPH, President and CEO, SisterLove, Inc.


Nancy Ehrenreich, JD, Professor of Law, Denver University School of Law


Michelle Fine, PhD, Distinguished Professor of Psychology, Graduate Center at the City University of New York*


Jeanne Flavin, PhD, Associate Professor of Sociology, Fordham University


Karen Floyd, Practice Manager of a Maternal-Fetal Medicine Practice


Susan Frelich Appleton, JD, Professor of Law, Washington University School of Law


Fredric D. Frigoletto, Jr., MD, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School*


Janet Gallagher, JD, Author, “Prenatal Invasions & Interventions: What's Wrong with Fetal Rights”


Cynthia Garcia Coll, PhD, Professor of Education, Psychology & Pediatrics, Brown University


Katherine Goldwasser, JD, Professor of Law, Washington University School of Law*


Laura E. Gómez, JD, PhD, Professor of Law, University of New Mexico School of Law


Linda Gordon, PhD, Professor of History, New York University


Michael A. Grodin, MD, Global Lawyers and Physicians


Kim Gutschow, PhD, Visiting Assistant Professor, Religion and Anthropology, Williams College*


Lisa Harris, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Studies, University of Michigan*


Eleanor Hinton Hoytt, President and CEO, Black Women's Health Imperative


Lisa Ikemoto, JD, LLM, Professor of Law, University of California Davis School of Law


Hytham Imseis, MD, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Charlotte, North Carolina


Susan M. Jenkins, JD, The Big Push for Midwives Campaign


Sujatha Jesudason, PhD, Executive Director, Generations Ahead


Carole Joffe, PhD, Professor of Sociology, University of California Davis


Hillary Jorgensen, LUZ Reproductive Justice Think Tank


Barbara Katz Rothman, PhD, Professor of Sociology, City University of New York


Linda K. Kerber, PhD, Professor of History, Lecturer in Law, University of Iowa


Linda Layne, PhD, Hale Professor of Humanities and Social Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute


Toni Bond Leonard, President and CEO, Black Women for Reproductive Justice


Barry M. Lester, PhD, Professor of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Director, Center for the Study of Children at Risk, Brown Medical School and Women and Infants Hospital*


Antoinette Sedillo Lopez, JD, Professor of Law, University of New Mexico School of Law


Judith Lorber, PhD, Professor Emerita, Graduate School and Brooklyn College, City University of New York*


L. Indra Lusero, Co-Director, The Elephant Circle


Erica Lyon, Founder, Director of Education, Realbirth


Mary Faith Marshall, PhD, FCCM


Carol Mason, PhD


Elaine Tyler May, PhD, Professor of American Studies and History, University of Minnesota


PJ McGann, PhD, Department of Sociology, University of Michigan


Howard Minkoff, MD, Chair of Maimonides Medical Center, Professor, State University of New York Downstate*


Jacinta Montoya, Executive Director, Colorado Organization for Latina Opportunity and Reproductive Rights


Lynn M. Morgan, PhD, Professor of Anthropology, Mount Holyoke College*


Sheigla Murphy, PhD, Director, Center for Substance Abuse Studies, Institute for Scientific Analysis


Judy Murphy, Co-Founder, Moms Off Meth*


Lawrence J. Nelson, PhD, JD, Senior Lecturer, Santa Clara University*


Robert Newman, MD, MPH, Director, International Center for Advancement of Addiction Treatment


Judy Norsigian, Executive Director, Our Bodies Ourselves


Michelle Oberman, JD, Professor of Law, Santa Clara University School of Law


Jon O'Brien, President, Catholics for Choice


Brandi Parrish, South Carolina Coalition for Healthy Families*


Cynthia A. Pearson, Executive Director, National Women's Health Network


Rosalind Petchesky, PhD, Distinguished Professor of Political Science, Hunter College & the Graduate Center, City University of New York*


Nicola Pitchford, PhD, Associate Professor, Fordham University*


Richard F. Rakos, PhD, Professor of Psychology, Cleveland State University


Leslie Reagan, PhD, Associate Professor of History, Medicine, Law and Gender and Women's Studies, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign


Dorothy Roberts, JD, Professor of Law, Northwestern University School of Law


Loretta Ross, National Coordinator, SisterSong


Rachel Roth, PhD, Author, “Making Women Pay: The Hidden Costs of Fetal Rights”


Connie Rudnick, Esq., Professor of Law, Massachusetts School of Law


Mary Russo, PhD, Professor, Hampshire College


Suzanne Sangree, JD


Karen Shain, Co-Director, Legal Services for Prisoners with Children


Eveline Shen, MPH, Executive Director, Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice


Ellen S. Silber, PhD, Fordham University Institute for Women and Girls


Sharleen H. Simpson, PhD, ARNP, Associate Professor, College of Nursing, University of Florida*


Emily Spitzer, JD, Executive Director, National Health Law Program


Wanda Jo Stapleton, Former State Representative, Oklahoma


Dana Stone, MD


Nada Stotland, MD, MPH, Professor of Psychiatry, Rush Medical College, Chicago


Renee Stromme, Executive Director, North Dakota Women's Network


Mia Kim Sullivan, Associate Director of Programs, Civil Liberties and Public Policy Program, Hampshire College


Barrie Thorne, PhD, Professor of Sociology and Women's Studies, University of California Berkeley*


Susan J. Tracy, PhD, Professor of History, Hampshire College*


James Trostle, PhD, Professor of Anthropology, Trinity College*


Deborah Tuerkheimer, JD, Professor of Law, University of Maine School of Law


Sandra Turner, PhD, MSW, Associate Dean, Fordham University Graduate School of Social Service


Ayelet Waldman, Author, “Bad Mother: A Chronicle of Maternal Crimes, Minor Calamities, and Occasional Moments of Grace”


Tracy A. Weitz, PhD, MPA, Assistant Professor, University of California, San Francisco*


Sandra Wilson, RN, Neonatal Intensive Care, Augusta, GA


Susan Yanow, MSW, Reproductive Health Consultant


Miriam Yeung, MPA, Executive Director, National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum


Karen Zivi, PhD, Assistant Professor, University of Richmond




*Institution listed for identification purposes only.




1 Editorial, Choosing a New Justice, N.Y. Times, May 7, 2009, at A30 (“If Mr. Obama chooses someone who believes Roe v. Wade was wrong, for example, abortion rights could be lost for a generation.”); James Oliphant, Abortion Issue Looms Over Supreme Court Choice, L.A. Times, May 3, 2009 (“Abortion issue looms over Supreme Court choice”); Editorial, Souter: The Extremist, Wash. Times, May 4, 2009 (“Mr. Souter's extremist position on abortion puts to rest the popular canard that he is a moderate.”).
2 Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
3 Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833, 859 (1992).
4 Bob Woodward & Scott Armstrong, The Brethren 233 (1979) (noting that during the Court’s deliberation on Roe, Justice Stewart insisted that the Court rule explicitly on the question of fetal personhood recognizing that creating a competition between the fetus and women and “[w]eighing two sets of rights would be dangerous”).
5 See Ward Cates, Legal Abortion: The Public Health Record, 215 Science 1586 (1982) (estimating that, before Roe, 200,000 to 1,200,000 illegal abortions were performed each year and that in 1965, 235 women died from illegal abortions).
6 See, e.g., In re Vickers, 123 N.W.2d 253 (Mich. 1963) (affirming dismissal of habeas corpus petition of a woman being held in county jail for contempt resulting from refusal to answer questions about her abortion); Commonwealth v. Hauze, 4 Pa. D. & C.2d 61 (Pa. Ct. Quarter Sess. 1955) (approving of indictment charging woman with conspiracy to submit to her own abortion); Jon Nordheimer, She’s Fighting Conviction for Aborting Her Child, N.Y. Times, Dec. 4, 1971, at 37 (Shirley Ann Wheeler was convicted of manslaughter because she had an abortion); 2 Held in Abortion Ring, N.Y. Times, Apr. 8, 1943, at 24 (Julia Mae Norwood was arrested in Connecticut for submitting to an abortion when police raided a suspected abortion provider’s residence); A Woman’s Crime, N.Y. Times, Jan. 22, 1878, at 8 (“Mrs. Margaret Koster … was arrested on complaint of her husband, last night, by Detective Schmitberger, of the Twentieth Precinct, on a charge of abortion. The woman was locked up pending the action of the Coroner.”).
7 See, e.g., State v. Ashley, 701 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 1997) (Ms. Ashley was charged with manslaughter and third-degree murder after she shot herself in the stomach resulting in the loss of her pregnancy. The Florida Supreme court eventually dismissed the indictment.); Rick Brundrett, Woman’s Abortion Is Unique S.C. Case, State (Charleston, S.C.), May 1, 2005, at A1 (Gabriela Flores convicted of illegal abortion after taking Cytotec to induce an abortion.); Catie O’Toole, Abortion Attempt Charge Lodged; West Monroe Woman Accused of Self-Abortion, Post-Standard (Syracuse, N.Y.), Apr. 11, 2007, at B1 (Katrina Pierce was charged with self-abortion after taking numerous Tylenol and Motrin in an apparent suicide attempt); Tim Landis, Self-Abortion Charge Makes Witt Woman’s Case a Rarity, State J.-R. (Springfield, Ill.), Jan. 31, 1996, at 1 (Lyn Lyerla charged with illegal abortion for allegedly attempting abortion on herself. After a non-jury trial, she was acquitted.); Lynn Paltrow, A Post Roe World With Criminal Penalties Our Mothers Could Not Have Imagined, Huffington Post, Jan. 7, 2006, available at
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lynn-m-paltrow/a-postroe-world-with-cri_b_14607.html.
8 Gilda Sedgh et al., Induced Abortion: Estimated Rates and Trends Worldwide, 370 Lancet 1338 (2007).
9 See David A. Grimes et al., Unsafe Abortion: The Preventable Pandemic, 368 Lancet 1908 (2006).
10 One Untrue Thing: Life After Roe, National Rev. Online, Aug. 1, 2007,
available at http://article.nationalreview.com/q=ZjkwNWQ4ZDQ2NTljNDg4MjUyYWIxZWQ0NDVjMTkxYjg=.
11 Janet Gallagher, Prenatal Invasions & Interventions: What’s Wrong with Fetal Rights, 10 Harv. Women’s L.J. 9 (1987).
12 In re A.C., 573 A.2d 1235, 1253 (D.C. 1990) (en banc) (vacating a court-ordered cesarean section that was listed as a contributing factor to the mother’s death on her death certificate); see also, George Annas, Foreclosing the Use of Force: A.C. Reversed, Hastings Ctr. Rep., July/Aug. 1990, at 27.
13 Pemberton v. Tallahassee Mem’l Reg’l Med. Ctr., 66 F. Supp. 2d 1247 (N.D. Fla. 1999); Presentation by Laura Pemberton at the National Summit to Ensure the Health and Humanity of Pregnant and Birthing Women, held in Atlanta, Georgia January 18-21 (2007), available at http://vimeo.com/4895023.
14 E.g., State v. Geiser, 763 N.W.2d 469 (N.D. 2009); Kilmon v. State, 905 A.2d 306 (Md. 2006); State v. Aiwohi, 123 P.3d 1210 (Haw. 2005); Whitner v. State, 492 S.E.2d 777 (S.C. 1997); Sheriff, Washoe County v. Encoe, 885 P.2d 596 (Nev. 1994); Johnson v. State, 602 So. 2d 1288 (Fla. 1992); see also Lynn Paltrow et. al, Criminal Prosecutions Against Pregnant Women (ACLU / Reprod. Freedom Project 1992).
15 Ferguson v. City of Charleston, 532 U.S. 67 (2001); Ferguson v. City of Charleston, 308 F.3d 380 (4th Cir. 2002) (remand); Dorothy Roberts, Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty 164-67 (1997); Laura E. Gomez, Misconceiving Mothers: Legislators, Prosecutors, and the Politics of Prenatal Drug Exposure (1997).
16 Lisa Sink, Prosecutors Seek to Protect Fetus of Jailed Woman: Arrested For Repeat Drunken Driving, She Hasn’t Agreed to Treatment, Milwaukee J. & Sentinel, Aug. 28, 1998, at 1 (in explaining why he opposed bail, District Attorney Paul Bucher said “Our concern is for the safety of the fetus and the community[.]”).
17 Richard L. Berkowitz, Should Refusal to Undergo A Cesarean Section Be A Criminal Offense?, 104 Obstetrics & Gynecology 1212 (2004); Howard Minkoff &
Lynn M. Paltrow, Melissa Rowland and the Rights of Pregnant Women, 104 Obstetrics & Gynecology 1234 (2004).
18 Reporter’s Transcript, People v. Stewart, No. M508197 (Cal. Mun. Ct. San Diego County Feb. 26, 1987) (transcript of hearing granting demurrer of indictment charging Pamela Rae Stewart with failing to support a child. According to the court, one theory that the prosecution relied upon was “that she failed to seek prompt medical attention when she experienced bleeding.”); Debra Cassens Moss, Is Ignoring M.D. Criminal? California Case Raises Questions of Women’s Duties During Pregnancy, A.B.A. J., Jan. 1, 1987, at 23 (noting Ms. Stewart was charged for “not doing what her doctor told her to do[.]”); see also Angela Bonavoglia, The Ordeal of Pamela Rae Stewart, Ms., Aug. 1987, at 92.
19 In re Unborn Child of Starks, No. 93,606 (Okla. Sept. 23, 1999); Transcript of Jury Trial, In re Unborn Child of Starks, No. JF990127 (Okla. Dist. Ct. Rogers County Nov. 24, 1999) (among the allegations of neglect, “she was in this environment that contained vapors and chemicals and other toxic substances that could not have been healthy for her unborn child or herself or anybody else in that residence.”).
20 Findings and Orders, In re Unborn Child Corneau, No. CP-00-A-0022 (Mass. Juv. Ct. Attleboro Div. Aug. 29, 2000) (finding Rebecca Corneau in contempt of court and ordering that she be held in a women’s prison until she gave birth because she refused to comply with a court-ordered prenatal exam); see also Ellen Goodman, Editorial, Just How Far Can the State Go in Protecting an ‘Unborn’ Child?’, Boston Globe, Sept. 10, 2000, at F7; Fetus Dispute Brings Wider Issue to Fore, Boston Globe, Sept. 10, 2000, at B1.
21 Transcript of Presentence Conference and Sentencing Proceedings, United States v. Tuleh, No. 09-19-B-W (D. Me. May 14, 2009). See also Judy Harrison, Judge Jails Woman Until Baby Is Born: HIV-Positive Diagnosis Spurs Extended Sentence, Bangor Daily News, June 3, 2009.
22 E.g., State v. McKnight, 576 S.E.2d 168 (S.C. 2003); McKnight v. State, 661 S.E.2d 354 (S.C. 2008); Gabrielle Maple, Miscarriage Proof Frees Woman; She Faces Charges of Killing Her Baby, Times-Picayune (New Orleans), Aug. 18, 2004 (Michelle Greenup was charged with homicide when she lost her pregnancy. Prosecutors later dropped the charges when medical evidence proved she had a miscarriage).
23 See Int’l Union v. Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. 187 (1991); Cynthia R. Daniels, At Women’s Expense: State Power & the Politics of Fetal Rights (1993); Rachel Roth, Making Women Pay: The Hidden Costs of Fetal Rights (2000).
24 Stallman v. Youngquist, 531 N.E.2d 355, 359-61 (Ill. 1988) (refusing to recognize the tort of maternal prenatal negligence, holding that granting fetuses legal rights in this manner “would involve an unprecedented intrusion into the privacy and autonomy of the [state’s female] citizens”).
25 E.g., In re J.D.S., 864 So.2d 534 (Fla. 2004); see also Susan Goldberg, Of Gametes and Guardians: The Impropriety of Appointing Guardians Ad Litem for Fetuses and Embryos, 66 Wash. L. Rev. 503 (1991).
26 Gilda Sedgh et al., Induced Abortion: Estimated Rates and Trends Worldwide, 370 Lancet 1338 (2007).
27 Ctr. for Disease Control & Prevention, Recommendations to Improve Preconception Health and Health Care – United States: A Report of the CDC/ATSDR Preconception Care Work Group and the Select Panel on Preconception Care, 55 (No. RR06) Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Rep., (Reports and Recommendations) 2 (Apr. 21, 2006), available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr5506.pdf.

Does Your State Value the Women Who Give Life?

March 01, 2007

Despite the many issues affecting women's health and lives, bills to further restrict abortion are likely to be the primary focus of your legislature's session this year. As a result of this extensive attention to this one aspect of pregnant women's lives, chances are that your state legislature will not address many other health issues of concern to pregnant women and mothers — not breast cancer nor heart disease, not the lack of health insurance for millions of women and children nor the lack of access to mother-friendly childbirth. Here are some suggestions for action you and your state can take to ensure that policies to advance a culture of life, values the women who give that life:
Download file

The Women's Media Center Features NAPW Commentary

August 02, 2006

Today the Women's Media Center featured a biting NAPW commentary about a federal law entitled the "Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act." This WMC Commentary by Lynn M. Paltrow: A Modest Proposal or Why I Support the Full Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act discusses one of the many disturbing bills pending in Congress.